U.S. Governments Methods of Dealing with People Suspected of Terrorist Involvement essays

U.S. Governments Methods of Dealing with People Suspected of Terrorist Involvement essays The concern of the United States with regards to terror and terrorists activities began way before the 9/11 terrorist incidents. There was the World Trade Center bombings in the 1990s and several attacks on U.S. citizens outside the U.S. Terror and terrorist incidents became a focal point in U.S. government policies immediately preceding the disasters of September 11, 2001. In a sudden change of stance, the government took off its gloves and dealt with terrorists in a manner they (the terrorists) understand well with iron fists! Many citizens hailed the governments efforts stating, It was high time the terrorists are given a dose of their own medicine! Others cried foul and began reminding the government of human rights, due process and freedom of expression. Suddenly, civil liberties were curtailed in the name of protecting the citizenry from the effects of terrorism. The two opposing fronts are at odds with each other giving viable arguments and stating each of their cases for and against the US governments methods of dealing with people suspected of terrorist involvement. One of the first acts of the government in the aftermath of 9/11 is the approval and implementation of the Patriot Act of 2001 or fully known as "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. The legislation contains ten titles that define the scope and measures of fighting terrorist activities, these titles are: Enhancing domestic security against terrorism; International money laundering abatement and anti-terrorist financing; Removing obstacles to investigating terrorism; Providing for victims of terrorism, public safety officers and their families; Increased information sharing for critical infrastructure protection; ...